OK, I had never read Antony and Cleopatra before this month. And I’ve only seen it once before, last year in Ashland. I thought that production felt disjointed (fast in the first half, frenetic in the second), but ultimately saved by the leads. I wasn’t sure if this disjointedness was the direction or the play itself.
The play is often referred to as a “mature tragedy.” Well, what the heck does that mean? That the protagonists are “of a certain age”? Or that the writing’s mature?
So needless to say, I wasn’t sure what to expect.
And now after a first read?
I’m still not sure about this play and my feelings toward it.
In some ways, it feels modern, almost screenplay-like, with its short scenes with huge location jumps.
In other ways, it feels like a stereotypical tragedy in that you’ve got the “winner” (who gets to write history) in Octavian, who’s left pronouncing last words over dead bodies.
I’m looking forward to a second read and a deep dive.
I know I want to hit some subjects:
- That barge speech
- Antony from this play vs. from Julius Caesar
- Octavian from this play vs. from Julius Caesar
- Cleopatra’s bad rap/rep
- The use of narrative or expository characters in the play
- The view of women in the play
- The role of performance in the play
And those are just off the top of my head. There will be others, I’m sure.
Anything you want discussed?
Let me know in the comments below…